Litigation Lawyer
London Borough of Hackney
last date
23 August 2026
Location/Place/Mode
Hackney, London, United Kingdom
Eligibility
Qualified solicitor, barrister who has completed pupillage, or Fellow of the Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx). Must demonstrate experience in a mixed litigation caseload within a local authority or similar public sector setting, specifically covering prosecutions, judicial reviews, injunctions, commercial disputes, high-value contract debt claims, and commercial property litigation. Strong advocacy skills, attention to detail, resilience, and alignment with the Council's PROUD values (Purpose and Respect, Ownership, Unity and Diversity) are essential.

Opportunity
Why Hackney's Litigation Role Redefines Public Sector Legal Careers
The London Borough of Hackney is not merely recruiting a lawyer; it is searching for a legal architect capable of navigating the complex intersection of public law, commercial disputes, and community advocacy. This Litigation Lawyer position, situated within the Litigation and Public Realm team, offers a rare blend of high-stakes courtroom advocacy and strategic policy influence. For legal professionals weary of the billable-hour treadmill in private practice, this role represents a pivot toward impact litigation—where the client is the public interest, and the outcome shapes the fabric of one of London's most dynamic boroughs.
"We are looking for a practising lawyer... who is solutions focused and driven to achieve successful outcomes for our clients." — London Borough of Hackney Recruitment Brief
The Strategic Importance of the Litigation and Public Realm Team
Hackney's Legal Service operates at the sharp end of local government accountability. The team does not simply defend the Council; it proactively shapes service delivery through the law. The caseload described—prosecutions, judicial reviews, injunctions, commercial disputes, high-level contract debt claims, and commercial property litigation—mirrors the breadth of a top-tier chambers' public law practice, but with a distinct municipal mandate.
Consider the judicial review component: these are not abstract constitutional exercises. They are live challenges to Council decisions on housing allocations, planning permissions, or social care provision. Winning here requires not just knowledge of Wednesbury unreasonableness or legitimate expectation, but an intimate understanding of the Council's operational realities. Similarly, commercial property litigation in Hackney involves defending regeneration schemes and landlord-tenant disputes in a borough where property values and development pressures are politically supercharged.
Decoding the Anonymous, Competency-Based Selection Process
This is where the opportunity diverges sharply from standard legal recruitment. Hackney Council has eliminated the CV and supporting statement entirely. This is a deliberate blind recruitment strategy designed to strip away pedigree bias—university name, firm brand, or gaps in employment history—and focus purely on demonstrable competence.
Applicants face a series of competency-based questions mapped directly to the job description and the Council's PROUD values framework. This demands a fundamentally different preparation approach:
- STAR Method Mastery: Every answer must follow Situation, Task, Action, Result. But the 'Result' must quantify public value: costs saved, precedent set, vulnerable resident protected.
- Values as Competencies: "Ownership" isn't a buzzword here; it's a scoring criterion. You must evidence proactive collaboration and accountability.
- Authenticity Over Polish: The Council explicitly warns against AI-generated responses. They are hunting for the unique voice of a practitioner who has wrestled with the messy reality of local government litigation.
Mastering the PROUD Values Framework for Your Application
The PROUD acronym—Purpose and Respect, Ownership, Unity and Diversity—is the lens through which every application is scored. This is not generic corporate speak; it is a contractual obligation to the community.
- Purpose and Respect: Frame your litigation experience through active inclusion. Did you adjust your advocacy style for a vulnerable witness? Did you negotiate a settlement that preserved a community asset?
- Ownership: Highlight instances where you took a failing case file, diagnosed the strategic error, and turned the outcome without waiting for instruction.
- Unity and Diversity: Evidence cross-departmental work. Litigation in a Council never sits in a silo; it touches housing, planning, children's services, and finance. Your answers must prove you can "break down silos."
Building a Narrative Without a CV: The Art of Competency Storytelling
Since you cannot list your cases, you must tell them. Select three to four "signature matters" from your career that collectively cover the required spectrum: a prosecution, a judicial review, a commercial dispute, and a property litigation matter. For each, prepare a modular narrative that can be adapted to different competency prompts—"Describe a time you managed a complex caseload," "Give an example of handling a sensitive confidential matter," "Tell us about a time you influenced a non-legal stakeholder."
Critical Insight: The Council values resilience and tenacity explicitly. Choose stories where the initial prognosis was poor, but your strategic intervention—perhaps a novel legal argument, a robust case management conference, or a mediated settlement—shifted the trajectory.
Leveraging Informal Chats: Networking with Rebecca Wright and Josephine Sterakides
The invitation to contact Rebecca Wright (Senior Lawyer) or Josephine Sterakides (Team Leader) is not a courtesy; it is a strategic intelligence-gathering opportunity. In an anonymous process, this is your only chance to humanize your application before the scoring begins.
- Prepare specific questions: "How does the team currently manage the tension between prosecution targets and restorative justice outcomes?" or "What is the current pipeline of judicial reviews concerning temporary accommodation?"
- Signal cultural fit: Reference the PROUD values naturally. Ask how "Ownership" manifests in daily case management.
- Respect boundaries: Do not ask for hints on the competency questions. Ask about the work, not the test.
Long-Term Career Trajectory: From Local Authority Litigation to Strategic Leadership
Accepting this role is a power move for a lawyer targeting Chief Legal Officer or Monitoring Officer positions. Local authority litigation provides the broadest statutory exposure in the UK legal market—housing law, community care, education, planning, highways, environmental regulation, and commercial governance all cross your desk.
Moreover, Hackney's commitment to flexible working and its explicit drive to diversify its workforce (particularly welcoming disabled applicants) signals a modern, sustainable employer. The interview window (week commencing 7 September 2026) suggests a start date aligned with the new legal year—perfect for a structured handover.
"There is no better place to work in London than Hackney; we have great pride in our borough, our communities, and our services." — Council Recruitment Literature
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: I am a barrister with 5 years' call but limited local government experience. Am I eligible?
A: Yes, provided you have completed pupillage and can demonstrate transferable advocacy experience in public law, regulatory prosecutions, or commercial disputes. The person specification requires a "practising lawyer" (solicitor, barrister, or CILEx Fellow). In your competency answers, focus on the skills—case analysis, written/oral advocacy, managing instructing solicitors—rather than the sector. Use the informal chat with Rebecca Wright to understand the specific procedural rules (e.g., Criminal Procedure Rules for prosecutions, CPR Part 54 for judicial reviews) that dominate their docket.
Q: How should I handle the prohibition on AI tools for the application?
A: Treat this as a positive constraint. The Council wants to hear your professional judgment, not a generic best-practice template. Write your answers in a single sitting per question, then edit for clarity and PROUD alignment. Use a trusted peer (ideally a public sector lawyer) to sense-check for jargon and authenticity. The "personal touch" they value is the specific detail: the name of the case management system you mastered, the exact wording of the injunction you drafted, the difficult client conversation you navigated.
Q: What does the 'anonymous selection process' actually mean for my references and background checks?
A: Anonymity applies to the shortlisting and interview scoring stages. The recruiting panel will not see your name, gender, ethnicity, or institution names during the competency assessment. However, once a conditional offer is made, standard pre-employment checks (references, DBS, qualification verification) will proceed with your full identity. This means your referees should be briefed on the competency framework so their references corroborate the specific behaviours you evidenced in your written answers.
Q: Is there a realistic pathway to partnership or senior leadership from this grade?
A: Absolutely. Hackney's Legal Service structure typically progresses: Lawyer → Senior Lawyer → Principal Lawyer/Team Leader → Head of Legal/Monitoring Officer. The Council's "ambitious" and "pioneering" values explicitly encourage internal progression. Many Monitoring Officers in London boroughs began as litigation lawyers in exactly this team. The breadth of the caseload—spanning criminal prosecutions to high-value commercial property disputes—builds the generalist strategic capability that Chief Executives look for in their legal advisors.